Can you skip documents or code them as neutral while reviewing documents in the Project Validation queue?

When reviewing documents in the Project Validation queue, the practice of coding every document as either positive or negative is crucial. This is because thorough and complete documentation coding ensures that all relevant information is accounted for, thereby supporting accurate validation of the project. By categorizing every document, the team can maintain a comprehensive overview of the project's data and mitigate the risk of overlooking important details that might impact outcomes or decision-making.

When every document is coded, it also facilitates clarity in the review process, allowing reviewers to have a clear understanding of which documents contribute positively or negatively to the project objectives. This approach is not just a procedural formality; it helps maintain integrity and consistency in the analysis and reporting phases, which are vital for project success.

In essence, skipping the coding of documents could lead to gaps in understanding the project's progress and issues, which is why a disciplined approach to document review—requiring coding every document—is strongly favored.