For a standard request for production needing redaction, which workflow type should be chosen?

When dealing with a standard request for production that requires redaction, the appropriate workflow type to choose is Prioritized Review. This workflow is specifically designed to handle documents that need particular attention based on their sensitivity or importance within the context of the case.

In a Prioritized Review, documents are evaluated in a manner that allows for the identification of sensitive information that must be redacted before production. This ensures that confidential or privileged information is not shared inappropriately, maintaining compliance with legal and ethical standards.

This type of review is essential when it comes to managing data efficiently and ensuring that redacted documents are handled properly without unnecessary delays. It allows teams to focus on important documents first, streamlining the process and ensuring a higher degree of accuracy and compliance in redaction.

The other workflow types, while useful in various contexts, do not provide the targeted approach needed for redaction in response to requests for production. A Coverage Review is often utilized to determine whether all relevant documents are included, while a Document Review addresses the general analysis of documents. A Final Review typically serves as the last stage to ensure overall quality and can follow the prioritized review but does not directly focus on the intricacies involved in the redaction process.