When you click Start Review in Relativity, it starts document analysis.

Outline

• Hook: The Start Review button isn’t a gimmick; it triggers a real, thoughtful process for document work.

• Core idea: For an active reviewer, Start Review launches document analysis, not just a coding step.

• Why it matters: This moment sets the tone for how a review project unfolds—what you read, how you tag, and what you decide.

• Clarifications: What happens after you click, and what doesn’t happen (like metadata access or settings changes).

• Practical flow: A simple sequence after starting—objectives, coding scheme, themes, decisions, and evidence.

• Real-world feel: A relatable analogy to make the concept stick.

• Quick tips: How to stay sharp after you press Start Review.

• Wrap-up: The button as a gateway to clear, purposeful evaluation.

Start Review: more than a button, a doorway to reading with intent

Let me explain the moment you hit Start Review. It’s not just a kinematic move in a clickstream; it’s the green light that launches the core activity of a reviewer’s day. When you press Start Review, you’re signaling the system to begin a thorough, structured engagement with the documents at hand. The aim isn’t to rush through pages. It’s to understand, interpret, and organize what you learn so the project can move forward with clarity.

What Start Review actually initiates

In practical terms, Start Review triggers document analysis. Think of it as turning from “storage mode” into “examination mode.” The platform shifts into a workflow where you read content, compare passages, note relevance, and start building a map of themes and issues. It’s where you start coding—but not only coding in isolation. You’re coding as part of a larger quest: figure out what matters, why it matters, and how it fits the questions your team is trying to answer.

Yes, you might hear people say, “coding documents” happens during review. That’s true in a sense, but the broader, more accurate lens is that you’re performing document analysis. You’re interpreting what you see, linking ideas, and deciding what tags, categories, or topics apply. You’re also beginning to decide how to judge the documents against the project’s goals. It’s a cohesive process, not a single task.

Common misconceptions—debunking them on the spot

Some folks assume Start Review merely opens a few metadata windows or tweaks a setting here or there. That’s not the core action. Accessing document metadata and adjusting user settings are related activities in a broader workflow, but they don’t constitute the primary move when you intend to analyze the content itself. The button isn’t a backstage dial for preferences; it’s a doorway into a careful reading, interpretation, and organization of information.

If you’re imagining the button as simply a way to “start coding” without context, you’re missing the rhythm of a real review. The beginning is about understanding the material, spotting the relevance of passages, and building a structured approach to what will come next. In the end, those early decisions shape the quality of the findings, the defensibility of conclusions, and the confidence your team has in the results.

A natural flow after you press Start Review

Once Start Review is activated, you enter a practical sequence that keeps you oriented and effective. Here’s a straightforward path many reviewers follow:

• Clarify the objective of the review session: What’s the purpose of the documents in this batch? What questions are you trying to answer?

• Establish a coding framework: Create a scheme of tags or themes that align with the project’s goals. Keep it simple at the start and expand if needed.

• Read with purpose: Spotlight key passages, statements of fact, assertions, and opinions. Note why each item could matter.

• Tag and categorize: Attach tags that capture themes, relevance, or risk. Use consistent language so others can follow your trail.

• Track decisions and rationale: Write brief notes on why you tagged something a certain way. This is your evidence trail, which helps teammates later.

• Iterate with the team: Share initial mappings, get feedback, and refine the approach. It’s a collaboration, not a solo sprint.

• Move toward conclusions: As patterns emerge, start aligning what you found with the project’s questions, so the next steps feel natural—and justified.

Think of it like opening a new case file in a library. You don’t rush to finish every page. You establish a reading plan, tag the most relevant shelves, and leave notes for the next reader who will pick up where you left off.

A relatable analogy to keep the idea grounded

Picture a librarian in a quiet, sunlit room with stacks of manuscripts. The Start Review button is like the moment when the librarian opens a fresh cart of documents. The first pass is gentle and deliberate: skim titles, scan headings, check for obvious red flags, and note where the most valuable content hides. Then the librarian sorts, marks, and returns to the desk with a plan for deeper reading. You’re doing something very similar, only with digital documents and a project’s specific questions in mind.

Practical tips to stay sharp after starting

• Keep your objective visible: A short checklist at the top of your screen helps you stay aligned with what matters.

• Use a light touch with tagging: Start with a small set of core tags. You can add more as the analysis deepens.

• Document your reasoning: Brief notes tied to each tag or passage save everyone time later.

• Balance speed with accuracy: It’s tempting to move fast, but accuracy makes the results more trustworthy.

• Check in with the team early: A quick sync on the tagging approach prevents scope creep and miscommunication.

• Build a simple template: A reusable starter kit for new document batches keeps things consistent.

Why this matters in a project management context

In a Relativity-powered workflow, Start Review is more than just a step—it’s a shaping moment. The way you approach initial analysis determines the clarity of your path forward. When teams agree on the early coding scheme and the themes that matter, they reduce friction down the line. You’ll spend less time arguing about what a passage means and more time proving why it matters. In short, a thoughtful start keeps the whole project moving with less backtracking.

Bringing clarity to the process, without losing humanity

This is where the human side shows up. Behind every document are stories, decisions, and consequences. As a reviewer, you’re not just tagging phrases; you’re translating complexity into an organized, defensible narrative. That blend of rigor and empathy—rigor for the facts, empathy for the people involved—helps teams navigate tough decisions with confidence.

A few practical reminders, laid out simply

• Start Review means document analysis: you’re interpreting content, identifying themes, and deciding how the material fits the bigger picture.

• Metadata and settings aren’t the focus at this moment: they’re part of a broader workflow, not the trigger for the session.

• A solid start creates a clear path: define objectives, build a simple coding scheme, tag consistently, and document your reasoning.

• Collaboration matters: loop in teammates to refine the approach and share learnings.

Closing thoughts: the quiet power of a thoughtful start

Pressing Start Review isn’t about hitting a button that does one thing in isolation. It’s about entering a discipline—the discipline of reading, understanding, and organizing information with purpose. For active reviewers, that moment carries the weight of the entire review—how you listen to the documents, how you hear the patterns, and how you translate that into actionable conclusions.

If you’ve ever stood in front of a long corridor of shelves, each with its own stories, you know the feeling. The Start Review moment is your cue to begin mapping that corridor in a way others can walk through confidently. It’s not flashy. It’s not glamorous. It’s essential. And when you get it right, the rest of the project unfolds with more clarity, less later doubt, and a sense of momentum that’s genuinely satisfying.

So next time you’re at your workstation and the Start Review button gleams at you, think of it as the first line of a thoughtful, collaborative, and well-documented reading journey. The outcomes aren’t just about what’s in the documents—they’re about how clearly you’ve shown why those contents matter. And that, in the end, is what good project work feels like: steady, purposeful, and human.