How are documents that are skipped or coded as neutral treated in the calculation of the elusion rate?

The correct answer indicates that documents coded as neutral or skipped are treated as relevant documents in the calculation of the elusion rate. This approach assumes that all documents, regardless of their classification, yield valuable insights during the review process.

The reasoning behind this classification can stem from the need to maintain a comprehensive view of the dataset being analyzed. In many legal and compliance contexts, even documents that are neutral or have not been specifically reviewed can influence the overall understanding of relevance for a particular matter. By treating them as relevant, it acknowledges their potential importance and ensures that the elusion rate reflects a more accurate assessment of the screening or review’s thoroughness.

Typically, documents deemed irrelevant would not contribute to the elusion rate, as they are excluded from relevance assessments altogether. Therefore, differentiating between "neutral" and "irrelevant" concurrently allows the project to account for all nuances in document relevance. This highlights the careful consideration that must be applied when managing the classification of documents in any project, particularly in a legal context.