Reviewers can change the coding decision on previously reviewed documents in an Active Learning project. True or False?

In Active Learning projects, reviewers retain the ability to revisit and modify their coding decisions on documents that have already been reviewed. This flexibility is essential, as it accommodates the dynamic nature of the review process, where new insights or changes in understanding may arise over time. The capacity to adjust prior decisions enhances the overall accuracy and reliability of the project outcomes.

Opening up the possibility for changes post-review allows for continuous improvement and refinement of the coding throughout the project. This is especially valuable in environments where data is being analyzed and interpreted on an ongoing basis.

Options suggesting that changes can only be made under specific conditions, such as requiring super user rights or being restricted to the initial review phase, limit the inherent adaptability that Active Learning is designed to promote. The system is structured to support ongoing collaboration and iteration among reviewers, reinforcing the validity of the answer that permits changes at any point in the review process.