What condition can be set to identify conceptual similar documents that have not been batched out?

Identifying conceptual similar documents that haven't been batched out requires a specific condition regarding the review priority status. When the review priority is not set, it indicates that these documents are potentially still in a preliminary state, which allows for the opportunity to categorize them based on their conceptual similarities. This condition helps teams to identify documents that require further analysis or categorization before they can be finalized or moved on to the next stage.

In contrast, when the review priority is set, pending, or complete, these documents are in a defined state of processing. If the review priority is set, it implies that the documents are already marked for review and have moved into a prioritized stage, making it less likely that they need to be examined for conceptual similarity at that point. Similarly, a pending status suggests that there are active tasks related to these documents, and a complete status indicates that the documents have already been finalized and reviewed. Hence, only when the review priority is not set can the identification of similar conceptual documents still be relevant and actionable.