When estimating Richness at the project's start, should documents be skipped or marked as neutral?

The statement suggests that documents should be either skipped or marked as neutral when estimating Richness at the project's start is indeed a viable approach. This is based on the understanding that not all documents hold the same level of relevance or significance during the initial estimation phase.

In project management, particularly in methodologies that emphasize managing knowledge and data, assessing the 'Richness' of documentation can help prioritize resources and efforts effectively. Marking documents as neutral or opting to skip them can streamline the process by focusing attention on those documents that provide the most value to the project. This allows for a clearer view and understanding of critical materials, ensuring that the project remains aligned with its objectives without getting bogged down by less pertinent information.

Choosing to mark documents as neutral can also indicate that these documents are recognized but not deemed immediately necessary in the context of the initial estimation, allowing for flexibility if their relevance increases as the project progresses. Thus, this practice helps maintain focus on essential tasks while keeping the option open to revisit these documents later if required.